If you're a regular reader of the blog, you may have noticed that a couple of weeks ago I reviewed Laura Barnett's debut novel The Versions of Us. Following a chance meeting in 1958, the lives of Eva and Jim play out in three possible ways, but which leads to greater happiness and fulfilment? It's a little like Sliding Doors, a little like Kate Atkinson's Life After Life. I loved it, so was delighted to be able to ask Laura a question or two about it......
Firstly, where did the idea for Versions of Us spring from?
Firstly, where did the idea for Versions of Us spring from?
Do
you know, I’m really not sure! I woke up one morning just over two
years ago with the seed of the idea planted in my mind. I’d written
two novels, neither of which was quite right, and had been thinking
about what to write next. That morning, I hit the snooze button on my
iPhone over and over again, and lay there imagining writing three
different versions of the story of one couple, from
beginning to end. With hindsight, I suspect I was inspired, in part, by
the fact I’d only recently got married, and was thinking about how
easily my husband and I might never have met.
It's
easy to spot the similarities with the film Sliding Doors, but to me
there's also a certain something shared with Kate Atkinson's Life After
Life; have you seen the film, or read Atkinson's book and did either
influence you in any way?
I
have seen Sliding Doors a few times - I was about fourteen when it
first came out, and I loved it, not least because my friends and I
often spent our evenings down by the river at Hammersmith, where some
of the film’s key scenes were shot! And once I’d had this idea about
telling multiple versions of the same love story, I watched the film
again to see how the writer and director had tackled
the challenge.
It’s
interesting, too, that you feel my book shares something with Life
After Life - Kate Atkinson’s book came out when I was about halfway
through writing the first draft of The Versions of Us, and I didn’t
read it until I’d finished. It’s an incredible work of fiction, and
reading it gave me a lot of confidence in trying to pull off such an
ambitious structure - but I wouldn’t say it influenced
me, as such. We writers have to be careful to keep our own voices
distinct from those of the other authors we admire.
Of
the three story-lines, do you have a 'favourite'? Mine, as I've said on
Twitter, is version two, though I'm not sure why as it certainly
doesn't always seem the happiest.
How
did you go about plotting and planning everything? Did you write the
three stories separately, then interweave them, or progress
each at the same time?
It’s
fascinating to hear that you feel a particular affinity with version
two - every reader seems to have their own particular reaction
to each version! I’m afraid I don’t have a favourite - each version
presented its own particular challenges and pleasures, and I kept
changing my mind about which one I was most enjoying as I wrote. I did
so consecutively, chopping and changing between the
three versions: the structure of that first draft was more or less
exactly as the novel still is now. It just felt right to me to weave the
three versions together from the start.
And...that
dreadful question all authors get asked ...what next? Are you already
planning/writing another book and, if so, could you
tell us something about it?
Thank you so much for taking time out to chat, Laura, and best wishes for your second novel. I, for one, will be eagerly awaiting it!
I'm even keener to read this now! Oh, where do I squeeze this in???!
ReplyDelete